Walk through a senior doctor's insurance file and a familiar collection appears. Two or three endowment policies, sold by an LIC agent in the doctor's twenties. A money-back plan, sold by a relative who joined an insurance firm. A unit-linked insurance plan, sold by a private bank as an "investment with cover". A child plan, sold for the daughter's education. A health policy, top-up health, critical-illness rider, and finally — usually small in cover, often missing entirely — a pure term policy.
The structure is recognisable because it is mass-produced. The medical profession, with its predictable career path, high savings rates, and trusting relationships, is a target market for the Indian insurance industry. Doctors are sold a particular cocktail with high regularity, and almost none of it is what they actually need.
What doctors actually need from insurance
Stripped to fundamentals, a practising doctor needs four kinds of protection.
1. Term life cover. Pure mortality cover, sized to replace the doctor's economic value to the family. For most doctors at age 35, this is somewhere between ₹3 crore and ₹10 crore, depending on dependants, lifestyle, and existing assets. Annual premium is small — typically under ₹50,000 for a healthy 35-year-old.
2. Disability cover. Income protection in the event of injury or illness that prevents practice. This is the most under-bought, most-needed cover for the medical profession. A surgeon who can no longer hold a scalpel does not need life cover; they need income replacement. Disability cover sized at 50-60% of expected income, until age 60-65, is the right structure. Most doctors don't have this at all.
3. Professional indemnity. Specific to the medical profession; structured to cover the financial consequences of a malpractice claim. Should be sized to the risk profile of the specialty. Surgeons need more; psychiatrists need less. Most clinic-owners are under-covered at the level the law now allows claims to reach.
4. Health cover. A robust family health policy plus a top-up. Critical-illness covers can be useful but are less essential than the basic. The cover should be portable — meaning it can move with the doctor if they change employer or move from hospital to private practice.
These four — term, disability, indemnity, health — are the entirety of the doctor's basic insurance needs. Total annual premium for a 35-year-old, well-structured, is rarely above ₹2-3 lakh.
What gets sold instead, and why
The collection a typical doctor accumulates is not this. It is dominated by investment-cum-insurance products: endowment plans, ULIPs, money-back schemes, child plans. Each of these is a hybrid — partly an insurance cover, partly an investment vehicle. Each is sold on the back of the cover it provides; each carries a high commission to the seller because of the embedded long-term lock-in.
The result is well-documented. The IRR of a 20-year endowment plan, returned to the policyholder, is typically 4-5.5% — meaningfully below post-tax returns from balanced mutual funds, fixed deposits, or even sovereign instruments over the same horizon. The "guaranteed" returns these plans advertise are nominal; their inflation-adjusted equivalent is often near zero.
The cover provided by these plans, meanwhile, is small relative to the premium paid. A doctor paying ₹3 lakh a year on an endowment policy might be carrying ₹50 lakh of life cover. The same doctor, with a pure term policy, would get ₹6 crore of cover for ₹50,000 a year, and could invest the remaining ₹2.5 lakh in a balanced portfolio — which would, over twenty years, comfortably exceed the endowment payout.
This arithmetic is not contested. It is, however, never demonstrated to the doctor at the point of sale.
The harder problem: the social fabric of mis-selling
The reason doctors are sold the wrong products is not that they are unsophisticated. It is that the products are sold to them by people they know and trust — long-time agents, family friends, distant relatives, junior bank managers — for whom the policy is the entirety of the conversation. The doctor does not have a quiet, independent advisor sitting on their side, asking the question: do you actually need this, or are you being asked to buy it?
The fix, in our practice, is mechanical. An insurance audit at the start of any new doctor relationship. Map every policy in force. Calculate the IRR of each one. Sum the total cover by category. Identify the gaps — usually, missing or underweight term and disability — and the over-pays — usually, layered endowment and ULIP. Restructure on a multi-year timeline. Cancel where it makes sense; surrender carefully where it doesn't; keep what was correctly bought.
The audit is uncomfortable for everyone involved except the doctor. It almost always saves the doctor ₹2-5 lakh a year in premium, while increasing their actual protection. We have not yet conducted one that did not.
A simple test
A useful test for any insurance product offered to a doctor: "What is the term equivalent — pure cover with the same protection — and what is the difference in premium?"
If the answer is "this product is much more expensive than the equivalent term cover, but it also acts as a savings vehicle," ask the next question: "What is the long-term return on the savings portion, expressed as an IRR after costs and taxes?"
If the answer is below 6%, the product is not good for the doctor. The doctor would do better holding pure term cover separately, and investing the difference. The seller may be a friend; the product is not the friend.
The clarity of this exercise, run once for every doctor, dramatically reduces what gets sold over the course of their career.
We send only when there's something worth saying — typically once or twice a month.